The $70 Million Wake-Up Call: Why Language Barriers Are Your Biggest Untracked Patient Safety Risk

The hospital had interpreter services available. The breakdown wasn’t about lack of resources. It was about a system’s failure to ensure accurate communication at a critical moment.

And the number that should haunt every Quality officer? Patients with limited English proficiency experience adverse events at nearly twice the rate of English-proficient patients. Research published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine found that 49.1% of LEP patients experienced adverse events involving physical harm—including medication errors, patient falls, skin breakdown, injuries during treatment, and equipment issues—compared to only 29.5% of English-proficient patients. Not 10% more. Not 20% more. Nearly twice the rate.

With over 25 million people in the U.S. classified as Limited English Proficient—and that number growing—this isn’t a niche problem. It’s a systemic patient safety risk that most organizations aren’t tracking, aren’t measuring, and aren’t treating with the same urgency as falls, infections, or medication errors.

The Pattern We Keep Seeing: Excellent Care, Broken Communication

A patient arrives at the ED. An interpreter is called for the initial assessment. The clinical team provides excellent care. But then the breakdown begins.

Discharge instructions? English only. Medication labels? English only. Follow-up appointment reminder? English only. Patient portal instructions to access test results? English only.

The patient nods, takes the papers, and leaves. Three days later, they’re back in the ED because they didn’t understand they were supposed to stop taking one medication before starting another. Or they missed the critical follow-up appointment because they couldn’t navigate the automated phone system. Or they never logged into the portal to see the abnormal lab result that required immediate action.

This is how people get hurt. And when we investigate these events, “language barrier” rarely shows up as the root cause because we’re not systematically looking for it.

The Financial Exposure No One’s Calculating

The Quality Blind Spot

That’s the issue. Most organizations can tell you how language access is resourced:

• How many interpreter minutes they purchased last month
• Which languages are most commonly requested
• Average wait time for telephone interpretation

But those metrics don’t tell you whether communication is actually effective.

What most organizations can’t see is where language barriers create risk across the care journey:

• At what points in the care journey LEP patients are at highest risk
• How often critical information isn’t communicated in the patient’s language
• Whether medication reconciliation is as effective for LEP patients as English-speaking patients
• If LEP patients are experiencing more preventable adverse events
• Whether care teams are consistently identifying language needs and documenting interpreter use

Without this data, you’re flying blind on a significant patient safety issue.

Why the Current Approach Isn’t Working

The Human Cost That Doesn’t Show Up in Dashboards

The mother who gave her child the wrong dose of medication because the instructions were in English and she was too embarrassed to admit she couldn’t read them.

The elderly man who missed six months of cancer follow-up appointments because the automated phone system reminders were in English and he couldn’t navigate them.

The woman who signed a consent form for a procedure she didn’t fully understand because the interpreter wasn’t available and the surgical team was running behind.

These aren’t hypothetical scenarios. These are real events that happen in U.S. hospitals.

And when something goes wrong, these patients often don’t complain. They don’t demand to speak to patient relations. They don’t file incident reports. They just quietly disappear from your system, often sicker than when they arrived, their trust in healthcare eroded.

What Needs to Change

Language access can’t remain an operational nicety that we address with ad hoc solutions and good intentions. It needs to become a strategic patient safety priority with the same rigor, investment, and accountability we apply to infection control, medication safety, and fall prevention.

That means:

• Systematic identification of risk: Every patient’s language needs should be documented at registration and visible across all systems. Care teams should know immediately if interpretation is required.
• Integrated workflows: Language access should be built into clinical workflows, not layered on top as an extra step that’s easy to skip when you’re busy. The default should be ‘interpreter provided’.
• Role-based training and reinforcement: Language access can’t rely on one-time orientation or informal knowledge transfer. Caregivers, especially bedside caregivers, need clear, role-specific guidance for when and how to use interpreters, how to document language needs and interpreter use, and how to ensure effective communication at key moments of care. Ongoing education, leadership reinforcement, and local champions are critical to sustaining consistent practices over time.
• Comprehensive written communication: Start with critical, high-impact materials—discharge instructions, medication information, consent forms, and care plan summaries—and ensure these are available in your patient population’s primary languages. AI-powered translation tools can help scale this effort more quickly and cost-effectively than traditional approaches, though human review remains essential for clinical accuracy. Build systematically from there, prioritizing materials based on safety risk and patient need rather than trying to translate everything at once.

• Data and accountability: You should be tracking language access the same way you track any other patient safety metric—with dashboards, targets, and accountability when performance gaps appear. Modern platforms now enable real-time experience monitoring, allowing organizations to catch issues as they happen rather than discovering them weeks later through incident reports. AI-powered quality monitoring can review 100% of interpretation sessions, not just a sample, giving you unprecedented visibility into where communication is breaking down and where it’s working well.
• Technology that enables rather than impedes: Modern interpreter and translation management platforms exist that can integrate with EMRs, route requests intelligently, track utilization, manage quality, and provide the data you need for both operational improvement and compliance documentation. AI is accelerating capabilities even further—from real-time translation to automated quality monitoring to predictive scheduling that reduces wait times.

The good news is that effective solutions exist. Health systems that have made systematic language access a priority are seeing measurable improvements in patient safety outcomes, satisfaction scores, and operational efficiency. We’ve written more about these solutions and the technology enabling them in our article, “The Infrastructure of Inclusion: Technology Enabling a Multilingual World.”

If You’re Accountable for Patient Safety, This Is Your Move

Here’s where we’d recommend you start:

1. Pull the data you’re not currently looking at.Analyze adverse events and near misses through a language access lens. Compare outcomes—readmissions, ER visits, medication errors, patient complaints—between your LEP and English-proficient populations. The disparities will tell you where to focus.
2. Shadow the LEP patient journey.Walk through registration, clinical encounters, discharge, follow-up, and billing from the perspective of someone who doesn’t speak English. Document every point where communication could break down. You’ll find more gaps than you expect.
3. Assess your current state honestly.Do you have systematic identification of language needs? Consistent interpreter utilization? Integrated technology? Translated written materials for all critical communications? Comprehensive data on language access quality and outcomes? Most organizations will find significant gaps. Cortico-X offers a comprehensive language access assessment—typically completed in 4-6 weeks—that helps healthcare leaders identify priority risks, quantify current costs, and develop a roadmap for systematic improvement.
4. Make it a board-level issue.Language access isn’t an operations problem to be managed quietly in the background. It’s a patient safety, quality, compliance, and financial risk that deserves board attention and executive accountability.
5. Invest in systematic solutions.Ad hoc fixes and patchwork approaches won’t move the needle. You need integrated technology, standardized workflows, accountability mechanisms, and the operational discipline to ensure consistent execution.

The Bottom Line

When we fail to communicate effectively with LEP patients, people get hurt. Outcomes worsen. Costs increase. Legal liability grows. And we violate the fundamental promise of healthcare: first, do no harm.

The systems and technology to fix this exist right now. What’s often missing is the leadership conviction to treat language access with the same urgency as any other patient safety priority.

Your Quality metrics depend on getting this right. Your financial performance depends on it. Your compliance posture depends on it. And most importantly, your patients’ safety depends on it.

The question is simple: Will you wait for your $70 million wake-up call, or will you act now?

We Want to Hear from You!